Build an evidence file, one decision at a time

A useful example starts with a current response, not a copied total. If a source fails, the page leaves the result unavailable rather than substituting a plausible figure.

A larger return is not automatically stronger evidence. Compare the composition before comparing medians: a broadened pool may add mostly different property types or tenures.

These are descriptive summaries of returned records. Neither median is a valuation, a price index or a claim about a typical home.

For practice, the subject is only described as a freehold semi-detached home. Bedrooms, floor area and condition are deliberately unknown. Change the broad fields below and see how the candidate count changes.

A match means only broad type, tenure and date align. It says nothing about size, condition, plot, parking, lease detail or sale circumstances.

Review the 16 most recent returned transactions. The page identifies mismatches against your rule but does not decide for you. Record a reason when judgement goes beyond the visible fields.

The screen asks which connected designations intersect the postcode centroid. It does not know the title boundary. Each returned reference is follow-up work; an empty response means only that no mapped record was returned from the connected datasets.

1. Keep the coordinates, source references and retrieval time.
2. Identify the actual property and title boundary.
3. Read the local direction and address-level planning history.
4. Assign any material conclusion to the appropriate professional.

The saved practice file preserves the source timestamp, your rule, reviewed rows, notes, planning references and next actions. It does not generate an offer price or claim that the retained records are professionally accepted comparables.